Sample brief · RivalStudy
Sample brief Illustrative brief based on the Notion study format. Real briefs are restricted to commissioning clients.
Commission a study →

Notion

Competitor intelligence brief · RS-0312 Programme · 20 interviews
Delivered 14 March 2026
Switchability score
72 /100
Beatable in 100–250 seat segment. Not everywhere.
{{ f.num }}
{{ f.label }}
{{ f.value }}
{{ f.sub }}
"
We've been looking for a reason to leave for 18 months. The annual renewal is the only thing keeping us.
VP RevOps · Enterprise SaaS · Respondent #07

Notion is vulnerable, but not easy to replace

{{ c.label }}
{{ c.value }}
{{ m.label }}
{{ m.value }}

What to do next

{{ a.num }}
{{ a.title }}
{{ a.desc }}

What would make them leave

Share of 20 respondents citing each trigger unprompted. Highest bar = strongest wedge.

{{ t.title }}
{{ t.why }}
{{ t.pct }}

Deal outcome drivers

Structured win/loss themes from 20 verified Notion customers. Percentages show share of respondents citing each driver when evaluating displacement.

{{ panel.title }}

{{ b.label }}
{{ b.pct }}
Read: Wins cluster on time-to-value and database depth. Losses cluster on migration friction and workflow familiarity. Product praise does not equal deal win.

Why this is not an easy win

What keeps the same respondents on Notion despite frustrations. Higher bar = stronger switching friction.

{{ t.title }}
{{ t.meaning }}
{{ t.pct }}
Implication: Fixing databases alone is not enough. The alternative needs to feel broad enough to replace daily workflows.

Where to focus sales effort

{{ s.label }}

{{ s.size }}
{{ s.score }} / 100 readiness
Top trigger: {{ s.trigger }}
Best buyer: {{ s.buyer }}
Sales motion: {{ s.motion }}

Sell against Notion

Notion weaknessYour attack angleLanguage to use
{{ b.weakness }}{{ b.attack }}{{ b.language }}

Objection

"{{ o.objection }}"

Recommended response

{{ o.response }}
{{ o.evidence }}

Who you actually need to beat

Alternative% consideringPositioning note
{{ a.name }}{{ a.pct }}{{ a.note }}
Answer: Coda and Airtable - together cited by 70% of respondents. Confluence is an enterprise fallback, not the primary competitive threat.

Gaps your competitor has not addressed

Entry points cited unprompted by respondents.

{{ n.severity }}
{{ n.need }}
Entry point: {{ n.entryPoint }}
"{{ n.quote }}"

Reactions to your mockup

Variant / focusReactionRespondentsSummary
{{ p.variant }}{{ p.reaction }}{{ p.respondents }}{{ p.summary }}

Current vs alternative willingness to pay

Avg spend
{{ pricingAvgSpend }}
Price sensitivity
{{ pricingSensitivity }}
ScenarioMedian
{{ pr.label }}{{ pr.value }}

Discount patterns: {{ pricingDiscountNote }}

Insight: {{ pricingInsight }}

Sample credibility

Methodology detail for audit purposes. All respondents verified on paid Business or Enterprise plans.

Roles

{{ p.label }}{{ p.pct }}

Company sizes

{{ p.label }}{{ p.pct }}

Plan tiers

{{ p.label }}{{ p.pct }}

Study metadata

Avg. tenure22 mo
Interview window14 days
Industries6
Median team size140

Verbatim evidence

Anonymised excerpts · click to expand · use filters to find relevant quotes

Trigger: {{ f.label }}
Segment: {{ f.label }}
Role: {{ f.label }}
{{ r.ref }}
{{ r.role }}
{{ r.size }} · {{ r.tenure }}
{{ r.sign }}

"{{ r.quote }}"

{{ r.full }}

No transcripts match the current filters.
Commission a study
Your competitor's customers are talking.
20 verified interviews. Delivered in 14 days.
Configure your study